Critical Assessment of MetaProteome Investigation 2 (CAMPI-2): Multi-laboratory assessment of sample processing methods to stabilize fecal microbiome for functional analysis

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Fecal samples are widely used as a proxy for studying gut microbiome composition in both human and animal research. Fecal metaproteomics provides valuable insights by tracking changes in the relative abundance of microbial taxa and their protein functions. To ensure reliable results, it is crucial to minimize alterations in the metaproteome occurring from sample collection to protein extraction. Therefore, employing effective stabilization methods is essential to preserve the integrity of the fecal metaproteome from sample collection to laboratory analysis, particularly over long distances or when rapid freezing options are not readily available. In line with these needs, the second edition of the Critical Assessment of MetaProteome Investigation (CAMPI-2) was specifically focused on testing sample stabilization protocols to be applied before metaproteomic analysis. Results This collaborative multicenter study assessed the ability of five different stabilization methods, based on two commercial devices and three specific reagents (acetone, lithium dodecyl sulfate, and an RNAlater-like buffer), respectively, to stabilize the fecal metaproteome during room-temperature storage (14 days) and shipment to mass spectrometry facilities. The five methods were tested simultaneously by eight different laboratories across Europe, using aliquots from the same fecal sample. After protein extraction and digestion, duplicate aliquots of the resulting peptides were analyzed independently by two mass spectrometry facilities at distinct international locations. Analysis of the mass spectrometric data using two different search engines revealed that the fecal metaproteome profile differed considerably depending on the stabilization method used in terms of richness, alpha and beta diversity, reproducibility, and quantitative distribution of main taxa and functions. Although each method showed unique strengths and weaknesses, a commercial swab-based device stood out for its remarkable reproducibility and ranked highest for most of the metrics measured. Conclusions CAMPI-2 allowed a robust evaluation of five different methods for preserving fecal metaproteome samples. The present investigation provides useful data for the design of metaproteomics and multi-omics studies where fecal sampling cannot be immediately followed by long-term storage at −80°C. Further optimization of the tested protocols is necessary to improve stabilization efficiency and control bias in the taxonomic and functional profile of the gut microbiome.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.