Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Implementing behavioural science-informed letter interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccination uptake in London residents. A difference-in-difference study in London, United Kingdom

2Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
6Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

The accelerated development of vaccines to mitigate COVID-19 was crucial in the response to the 2020 pandemic. The success of vaccination strategies relies upon adequate uptake across the population. In the United Kingdom, COVID-19 vaccination began in December 2020, with population groups invited in priority groups according to age and clinical vulnerability. By February 2021, uptake rates were lower in North West London than the national average. This study aimed to explore whether behaviourally-informed (BI) letters could increase the rate of first vaccine uptake in previously uncontactable residents. BI letters were designed to invoke a sense of ownership, and highlight the ease of accessing a vaccine. Letters were sent to unvaccinated uncontactable residents in a Central London Borough over a 3-week period. Three neighbouring boroughs in London with similar non-responder data acted as controls. A linear difference in difference (DID) analysis assessed the change in the rate of vaccine uptake across all four boroughs, with percentage point change adjusted for covariates including ethnicity, age, gender and socioeconomic status. In total, 10,161 residents in Central London were eligible to receive our BI letter. All four boroughs demonstrated an increase in vaccination, with an absolute increase of 4.3 % in the intervention borough. Our linear DID analysis showed a 14.7 % increase in vaccination likelihood in the intervention borough following the intervention on average across all weeks included in the study. Residents with a mixed or multiple ethnic background were less likely to receive a COVID-19 vaccination. Those from a more deprived socioeconomic background demonstrated the largest rate of change. Our study highlights the effectiveness of traditional communication strategies such as letters in those who are uncontactable by other means. Incorporating behavioural science principles into healthcare communication, such as those designed to evoke a sense of ownership can enhance their effectiveness.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Implementing behavioural science-informed letter interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccination uptake in London residents. A difference-in-difference study in London, United Kingdom
Date Crossref
01/03/2025
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Behavioral Health and InterventionsVaccine Coverage and HesitancyMedia Influence and Health

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.