High-Yield Cellulose Nanocrystals from Bleached Eucalyptus Fibers via Maleic Acid Hydrothermal Treatment and High-Pressure Homogenization
Rattachement africain : Tunisie, es, fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This study reports the preparation of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) from commercial bleached eucalyptus Kraft pulp (BEKP) using a hydrothermal treatment in the presence of maleic acid (MA), followed by high-pressure homogenization. Compared with conventional hydrolysis methods, this approach offers significant advantages, including lower acid concentration, higher yield, and milder processing conditions. CNCs were produced with a high yield (70-85 wt %) by high-pressure homogenization of hydrothermally treated BEKP fibers with 10-20 wt % maleic acid at 150 °C, giving rise to a stable translucent gel of CNCs with a rod-like morphology (200-400 nm length and 10-40 nm width). The reinforcing potential of the CNCs was also assessed by preparing nanocomposite films with CNC contents of up to 15 wt %, and the results were compared to commercial CNCs from CelluForce. Additionally, their biodegradability in aquatic media was assessed using biological oxygen demand, with results compared to those of neat cellulose fibers. The MA-assisted hydrothermal process is an environmentally friendly alternative to conventional CNC production methods, offering higher yields and enhanced thermal stability while preserving a strong reinforcing property.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- High-Yield Cellulose Nanocrystals from Bleached Eucalyptus Fibers via Maleic Acid Hydrothermal Treatment and High-Pressure Homogenization
- Date Crossref
- 30/01/2025
- Éditeur
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.