Deep Learning Approach Predicts Longitudinal Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Changes
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This study aims to develop deep learning (DL) models to predict the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness changes in glaucoma, facilitating the early diagnosis and monitoring of disease progression. Using the longitudinal data from two glaucoma studies (Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) and African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES)), we constructed models using optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans from 251 participants (437 eyes). The models were trained to predict the RNFL thickness at a future visit based on previous scans. We evaluated four models: linear regression (LR), support vector regression (SVR), gradient boosting regression (GBR), and a custom 1D convolutional neural network (CNN). The GBR model achieved the best performance in predicting pointwise RNFL thickness changes (MAE = 5.2 μm, R2 = 0.91), while the custom 1D CNN excelled in predicting changes to average global and sectoral RNFL thickness, providing greater resolution and outperforming the traditional models (MAEs from 2.0–4.2 μm, R2 from 0.94–0.98). Our custom models used a novel approach that incorporated longitudinal OCT imaging to achieve consistent performance across different demographics and disease severities, offering potential clinical decision support for glaucoma diagnosis. Patient-level data splitting enhances the evaluation robustness, while predicting detailed RNFL thickness provides a comprehensive understanding of the structural changes over time.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Deep Learning Approach Predicts Longitudinal Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Changes
- Date Crossref
- 31/01/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.