Reimagining the Medical School Accreditation Process in a Rapidly Changing Health Care Environment
Rattachement africain : cn, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT: Health care is changing rapidly due to advances in biomedical science and technology, as well as an expanding body of medical knowledge. This transformation necessitates a reevaluation of medical education models. The medical school accreditation process, administered through the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) for MD-granting schools in the United States and Canada, plays a crucial role in maintaining educational standards. However, current LCME accreditation standards sometimes conflict with innovative educational practices, potentially hindering necessary progress. This Commentary considers how the accreditation process could better support medical education as it advances and adapts to the evolving needs of the health care environment. The authors propose strategies to enhance the accreditation process and better serve medical schools: align accreditation with competency-based education, share best practices identified during the accreditation process, encourage innovation, address financial burdens associated with preparing for accreditation, support institutional missions, embrace advances in science and technology, and facilitate rapid curriculum changes. Balancing compliance with innovation would help schools optimize the educational journey for future physicians and advance the shared goals of improved medical education and patient care.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Reimagining the Medical School Accreditation Process in a Rapidly Changing Health Care Environment
- Date Crossref
- 30/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.