Aller au contenu principal
2025 conference-abstract

Abstract WP167: Posterior Circulation Stroke is Associated with Increased Risk of Misdiagnosis as Compared to Anterior Circulation Stroke in a Multistate Cohort

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Small studies have found that patients presenting with posterior circulation ischemic strokes are more likely than patients with anterior circulation strokes to suffer a missed or delayed diagnosis in the ED. We evaluated whether probable ED stroke misdiagnosis was more common among patients subsequently hospitalized with anterior versus posterior circulation acute ischemic strokes using a large, multistate cohort. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative claims data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project on all hospital admissions and ED visits across 11 states from 2016-2021. To identify patients with a probable ED misdiagnosis, we identified stroke patients with an ED visit for a neurological complaint resulting in discharge to home (treat-and-release visit) in the 7 days preceding hospitalization for ischemic stroke. We used validated International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes to identify stroke patients with anterior or posterior circulation strokes. We used logistic regression to determine the odds of misdiagnosis depending on stroke location adjusting for demographics and vascular risk factors. Results: We identified 264,705 ischemic stroke patients with a documented territory of brain infarction; 191,689 (72%) had anterior circulation stroke, 63,697 (24%) had posterior circulation stroke, and 11,319 (4%) had stroke involving both territories. Based on preceding ED treat-and-release visits, 1,116 (0.58%) patients with anterior circulation stroke, 944 (1.48%) patients with posterior circulation stroke, and 82 (0.72%) with stroke involving both territories had a probable ED misdiagnosis. After adjusting for demographic and vascular risk factors, posterior circulation strokes had a higher odds of probable ED misdiagnosis relative to both anterior (adjusted OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 2.23-2.66) and mixed territory cases (adjusted OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.62-2.55). Conclusions: Patients with posterior circulation stroke are over two times as likely to have a probable misdiagnosis in the week preceding their hospital admission relative to patients with anterior circulation stroke. These data highlight a disease of high diagnostic uncertainty and an opportunity for stroke quality improvement.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Abstract WP167: Posterior Circulation Stroke is Associated with Increased Risk of Misdiagnosis as Compared to Anterior Circulation Stroke in a Multistate Cohort
Date Crossref
01/02/2025
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.