Abstract 9: Bridging thrombolysis prior to thrombectomy does not modify the association between Direct-to-angiography vs Repeat Imaging approaches and functional outcomes after EVT in transferred patients
Résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: For patients transferred for EVT considerations, direct-to-angio approach is shown to reduce time to procedure and improve clinical outcomes. We aimed to assess if IV thrombolytics status prior to transfer modifies the association between direct-to-angio approach and improved clinical outcomes in transferred patients who received EVT. Methods: In a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort of transferred EVT patients from 6 centers across US and Europe, patients were stratified based on IV thrombolytic status. Association of direct-to-angio approach vs repeated imaging approach with functional outcomes was assessed among patients with and without IV thrombolytics using appropriate regression models adjusted for age, stroke severity, time to procedure, occlusion location, serum glucose and successful reperfusion status. Heterogeneity of association was evaluated using multiplicative interaction. Results: Of 1135 patients with documented IV thrombolysis status, 612 (54%) received IVT – with younger age (IVT - 68 (57-78)y, no IVT - 70 (60-79)y, p=0.032) and higher CT ASPECTS (IVT: 8 (7-10) vs no IVT: 8 (7-9), p=0.038), but similar NIHSS (IVT: 17 (13-21) vs no IVT: 17 (12-21), p=0.91). Estimates of association favored direct-to-angio approach among both no IVT (acOR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.38 to 3.08, p-value<0.001) and IVT (acOR: 1.33, 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.86, p-value: 0.099), without significant heterogeneity (p-interaction: 0.17). Similar findings were also observed for functional independence (IVT - aOR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.08 to 2.49, p-value: 0.021; no IVT: aOR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.25 to 3.58, p-value: 0.005; p-interaction: 0.57) and independent ambulation (IVT: aOR: 1.45, 95% CI: 0.93 to 2.26, p-value: 0.097; No IVT: aOR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.68 to 5.06, p-value<0.001; p-interaction: 0.10) – Table 1. Interpretation: From a retrospective cohort of transferred patients who received EVT, use of IV thrombolytics at baseline did not modify the association between DTA vs RI approach and functional outcomes at 90-day follow-up, suggesting the feasibility of DTA approach regardless of baseline IVT status.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Abstract 9: Bridging thrombolysis prior to thrombectomy does not modify the association between Direct-to-angiography vs Repeat Imaging approaches and functional outcomes after EVT in transferred patients
- Date Crossref
- 01/02/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.