Aller au contenu principal
2025 conference-abstract

Abstract WP90: Cost of Stroke Treatment: A Comparative Analysis of Mobile Stroke and Standard Treatment

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: Over the past decade, Mobile Stroke Treatment Units (MSTU) have enhanced the quality of stroke care in the United States by bringing the hospital to the patient. While MSTUs improve stroke patient outcomes compared to standard hospital care, there are still limited units operating. The implementation of a MSTU requires considerable initial and long-term investment limiting their widespread programmatic formation. We evaluated a MSTU program in Florida between August 2023 and April 2024 for comparative patient associated out of pocket costs with MSTU and standard stroke care. Methods: A discrete time Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) model was used to estimate incremental cost-savings associated with MSTU treatment compared to standard hospital care. The Markov model captured treatment costs for the care of patients at two functional levels as defined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The potential cost-savings was determined by comparing the estimated costs incurred by the MSTU cohort to a counterfactual scenario of standard care of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) transport to the Emergency Department (ED). Since the model focused on the cost of patient care, costs included only billed ED, inpatient, and outpatient hospital care and services provided in the baseline year and then estimated cost of care over the next four years. All values represent 2024 dollars ($) and a 3% discount rate was applied to years two through four. Results: The MSTU treated 59 acute stroke patients with an average age of 71.86 (SD=13.78). Overall, 76% (N=45) were diagnosed with ischemic stroke, 9% with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and 15% with transient ischemic attack (TIA). At discharge, 54% were independent and 46% dependent. In Year 1 (baseline), out of pocket cost differential between MSTU patients and the standard care was estimated to be $5,306 and $6,485 for the independent and dependent patients respectively. Projected future cost differentials in Years 2 to 4 were $4,571, $3,845, and $2,817 for the independent functioning cohort and $5,586, $4,700, and $4,188 for the dependent functioning cohort. Conclusion: These results suggest that the out of pocket cost for MSTU patients was significantly lower than standard care both at baseline and over the first four years post-stroke, making MSTU acute stroke management a better economic system of care for time metrics, long term patient outcomes, and cost effectiveness.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Abstract WP90: Cost of Stroke Treatment: A Comparative Analysis of Mobile Stroke and Standard Treatment
Date Crossref
01/02/2025
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • UF Health Shands Hospital pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • University of Florida pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

UF Health Shands Hospital et University of Florida.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Acute Ischemic Stroke ManagementStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.