Correlation of pulmonary artery systolic pressures derived from echocardiography and hemodynamic catheterization in patients with tricuspid regurgitation: a large single-center study

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Introduction Echocardiography is the recommended modality for non-invasive assessment of pulmonary pressures. However, in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR), the reliability of echocardiographically derived systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) is questioned. Limited data exists on the correlation between echocardiography and right heart catheterization (RHC) in selected group of patients with severe TR. Purpose To evaluate the correlation between echocardiographic and RHC measurements for sPAP in patients with varying TR severity. Method Patients who underwent echocardiography and RHC within three days at a large single referral center were retrospectively included. Exclusion criteria included incomplete echocardiographic and RHC data, ≥moderate pulmonary stenosis, low-quality images, and pregnancy. Echocardiographic sPAP was calculated using simplified Bernoulli equation. Echocardiographic right atrial pressure (RAP) was assessed by evaluating inferior vena cava (IVC) dimension and collapsibility. A difference of ≥10 mmHg between the two modalities for sPAP was considered clinically significant. Results Of 3696 patients included, mean age was 64±14 years, 1689 (46%) were females, 1659 (45%) had systemic hypertension, and 582 (16%) had atrial fibrillation. TR was Conclusion The correlation between echocardiographic and RHC measurements is good for sPAP, even in severe TR patients, while it is only fair to moderate for RAP. A clinically significant difference between echocardiographic and RHC sPAP is more commonly observed in patients with PH, with right ventricle-right atrium gradient misestimation being the most common cause.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.