Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

P-1822. Management of Patients with a History of Penicillin Allergy: A Retrospective Observational Study from Saudi Arabia

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background It has been estimated that 8 to 25% of populations studied globally are labeled penicillin-allergic. However, almost 90% of these patients may not have a true allergy upon work-up, which led prescribers to substitute β-lactams unnecessarily with other broadspectrum antibiotics. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe how patients with a history of penicillin allergy are treated for infectious diseases, and determine the cost associated with alternative antibiotics.Table I.Baseline characteristics of patients with a documented history of penicillin allergy. Methods A retrospective observational study conducted in a tertiary-care teaching hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board, and electronic health records (EHRs) of patients were included if they were 18 years old and older, labeled to have penicillin allergy, and were admitted in medical wards or treated as outpatients. Results Among the 235 included patients, the type and severity of allergy reactions were not reported in the majority of patients 200 (85%) and were described in only 35 (15%) patients, which 27 (12%) of them had IgE-mediated allergic reactions (angioedema, anaphylaxis, bronchospasm, and urticaria). None of the cases were referred to an immunologist. Most common antibiotic indications included surgical prophylaxis 81 (33%), followed by respiratory 64 (27%) and gastrointestinal infections 40 (17%). For patients with documented penicillin allergy, macrolides were the most used alternative antibiotics followed by clindamycin, cephalosporins, and fluroquinolones in 63 (26%), 56 (24%), 50 (21%), and 30 (12%) patients, respectively. Conclusion This study reveals that mislabeling penicillin allergies in Riyadh's tertiary hospital leads to using less effective antibiotics, increasing adverse reactions, infections, and healthcare costs. It emphasizes improving allergy verification to enhance antibiotic use and reduce expenditures. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
P-1822. Management of Patients with a History of Penicillin Allergy: A Retrospective Observational Study from Saudi Arabia
Date Crossref
29/01/2025
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Drug-Induced Adverse ReactionsUrticaria and Related ConditionsContact Dermatitis and Allergies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.