Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

P-2057. Immunogenicity of COVID-19 Booster Vaccines in Mexico and Mongolia

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
10Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background InVITE (NCT# 05096091) is a 7-country observational study assessing immune responses to COVID-19 vaccines offered from national vaccination programs. This analysis focuses on the response 2 months after receipt of a booster vaccine (third dose) among participants from Mexico and Mongolia. Vaccines assessed were mRNA (Comirnaty, Pfizer (BioNTech), non-replicating viral vector (Vaxzevria, Oxford/AstraZeneca; Sputnik-V, Gam-COVID-Vac), or inactivated virus vaccines (CoronaVac, SinoVac and Covilo, Sinopharm). Methods Blood samples were taken at baseline (Visit 1) and 2 months after receipt of booster (Visit 2). Information on primary vaccine regimens (receipt of first 2 COVID-19 vaccine doses) was collected. Quanterix SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG assay measured anti-Spike (S) antibody levels. BioRad Platelia SARS-CoV-2 assessed anti-Nucleocapsid pan Ig (anti-N) antibody levels. Multivariate regression models were used to compare booster vaccines and regimens (primary+booster) based on log10 anti-S levels. CoronaVac and Covilo were excluded from some analyses due to small numbers (≤10 participants). Violin plot with estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of anti-S levels at Visit 1 and Visit 2. Groups with >10 participants were included. Results We report on 698 participants with Visit 1 and Visit 2 anti-S levels measured. 59.5% were women, 46.3% were 40-59 and 24.4% were ≥60 years old. 33.7% reported hypertension/diabetes and 22.2% had body mass index >30. 65.6% and 70.8% were positive for anti-N antibodies, at Visit 1 and 2, respectively. Anti-S levels at Visits 1 and 2 are shown in Figure 1. After adjusting for country, the booster with Comirnaty produced higher anti-S levels compared to Vaxzevria and Sputnik V, and Sputnik V produced relatively higher levels than Vaxzevria (Figure 2). When comparing combinations of primary and booster vaccines, Comirnaty + Comirnaty had the highest anti-S levels (Figure 3). Difference between log10 anti-S levels at Visits 1 and 2 with 95% CI for comparison of booster vaccines, adjusted for country. Conclusion Immune response to booster COVID-19 immunization differed by vaccine with the highest response seen when Comirnaty was included in a regimen. These data, including vaccines and geographic locations rarely reported in other studies, enrich understanding of immunogenicity to different combinations of vaccines used as primary and booster doses. Figure 3 Difference between vaccine combinations (primary vaccine + booster vaccine) log 10 anti-S levels with 95% CI to compare combinations. Rows without a line indicate 'no data' for those combinations. Disclosures Juan Pablo Ramírez-Hinojosa, MD, Abott: Honoraria|Jansen: Honoraria|Silanes: Honoraria Irini Sereti, M.D., NeoImmunotech: Collaboration

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
P-2057. Immunogenicity of COVID-19 Booster Vaccines in Mexico and Mongolia
Date Crossref
29/01/2025
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyImmune responses and vaccinations

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.