P-2. Public Health and Economic Impact of Implementing Gender-Neutral Vaccination with the 4-Valent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine in Costa Rica
Rattachement africain : br, us, cr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Background In 2019, the quadrivalent human papillomavirus female only-vaccination (4vHPV-FOV) was introduced for 10-year-old girls in the Costa Rican National Immunization Program. This analysis aims to estimate the public health impact and the incremental cost-effectiveness of switching from a 4vHPV-FOV to a 4vHPV-GNV in Costa Rica.Table 1.Main parameters used in the model Methods A validated dynamic model of HPV disease transmission was calibrated to simulate the natural history of HPV infection and attributable disease burden in Costa Rica. The model assumed a two-dose schedule over a 100-year time horizon, lifetime immunity after vaccination, continuous cytology screening, and herd immunity. The outcomes measured were incremental averted cases and deaths of cervical, vaginal, vulvar, anal, penile, head & neck HPV-attributable cancers; recurrent respiratory papillomatosis, genital warts, and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN); and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed in quality-adjusted life years. Outcomes and costs were discounted at 3% annually rate. Costa Rica specific data were used for calibration (Table 1). The WHO definition of cost-effectiveness was used to define the threshold of highly cost-effective (ICER < 1 GDP/per capita or US$13,365.4 for Costa Rica).Table 2.Additional avoided cases/cumulative percent reduction and deaths/mortality percent reduction of HPV-attributable diseases and cancers with 4vHPV-GNV strategy relative to 4-HPV-FOV over 100 years in Costa Rica. Results After 100 years, the 4vHPV-GNV strategy was projected to avert an additional 206,211 cases and 481 deaths compared to 4vHPV-FOV. The greatest reductions in burden and costs were due to HPV-6/11-attributable diseases (Table 2 and Fig. 1). For HPV 16 and 18-attributable cancers, the greatest reductions in burden were observed in cervical cancer, CIN 1 and 2/3 for females, and head & neck and penile cancers for males (Fig 1 and 2). 4vHPV-GNV was highly cost-effective with an ICER of US$ 2,166.Figure 1.Estimated healthcare costs avoided over 100 years by HPV genotype in Costa Rica Conclusion In Costa Rica, switching from a 4vHPV-FOV to a 4vHPV-GNV strategy is projected to be a cost-effective intervention, providing a substantial public health impact in both genders. The 4vHPV-GNV scenario would result in faster and greater reductions in the incidence of HPV 6/11/16/18-attributable diseases and cancers compared to the 4vHPV-FOV.Figure 2.Estimated HPV 6/11/16/18-attributable disease and cancer incidence over 100 years in Costa RicaA.Genital warts among females, B. Genital warts among males, C. Anal cancer among males, D. Head & Neck cancers among males Disclosures Juan Carlos Orengo, MD, MPH, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc: Employee|Merck & Co., Inc: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Ana Marisol Rendon, MD, MS, Merck & Co., Inc: Employee|Merck & Co., Inc: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Bruna Cristina Lima, n/a, Merck & Co., Inc: Employee Andrew Pavelyev, n/a, HCL America, Inc.: emplo Vincent Daniels, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc: Employee|Merck & Co., Inc: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Kunal Saxena, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Wilberth Herrera-Solano, MD, Consultant: Consultant Cintia I. Parellada, MD, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc: Employee|Merck & Co., Inc: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- P-2. Public Health and Economic Impact of Implementing Gender-Neutral Vaccination with the 4-Valent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine in Costa Rica
- Date Crossref
- 29/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.