Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 conference-abstract

P-1021. Comparative Clinical profile, Anti-Fungal resistance rates and in-hospital mortality in hospitalized patients with Candidaemia caused by Candida Auris versus Non-Auris Candida in a tertiary-care centre

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Candidemia, a severest manifestation of invasive candidiasis, often encountered in intensive care units (ICUs) is predisposed by prolonged ICU-stay, immunosuppression or mechanical ventilation. In India, while various species of Candida (C. tropicalis, C. albicans, C. auris and others) are involved in candidemia, C. auris is particularly known for displaying higher anti-fungal resistance. We investigated, whether there was a difference in the clinical pattern of candidemia caused by C. auris vs non-auris Candida in our tertiary-care centre.Figure 1.Comorbidities among patients with candidaemia: C. auris group versus non-auris candida group CANDIDA AURIS VS NON-AURIS CLINICAL RISK FACTORS Methods The analysis involved 65 unique episodes (one patient per episode) of documented candidemia in our tertiary-care centre during January 2022 to April 2024. The clinical data was retrieved from the blinded hospital records. The day of admission of patients in to ICU was considered as hospital day-1. Results Among 65 episodes, 17 (26.2%) and 48 (73.8%) were that of C. auris and non-auris candida, respectively. The time to blood culture positivity was longer with C. auris cohort compared to non-auris candida cohort (median hospital days 27 vs 19). Total hospitalization days (median) were 49 and 15.5, P value 0.002 respectively. In-hospital mortality was 58% in C. auris group and 62.5% in non-auris candida group. There was more proportion of cancer patients in non-auris candida cohort while use of immunosuppressive drugs was more frequent in C. auris cohort (Figure 1). Resistance rates to fluconazole, amphotericin, and echinocandins were higher in C. auris group (94.5% vs 25%; 70.5% vs 6.3%; 11% vs 2.1%, respectively)..Total Parenteral Nutrition > 5 days (26.2% vs 73.9%) P value 0.38, Transplant Patients (47.05% vs 14.58%) , immunosuppressive drugs (64.7% vs 39.6% ) P value 0.07 and Mechanical Ventilation (88.2% vs 52.1%) P value 0.008 respectively. Conclusion C. Auris has emerged as a notorious Non Albicans Candida species with substantial morbidity and mortality suggesting change in the epidemiology of candidaemia. Patients with Candida auris had longer hospital stay and blood to positivity than others. Fluconazole resistance remains highest in candida auris than other species of candida and majority of isolates of C.auris had high MICs for amphotericin B. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.

Titre Crossref
P-1021. Comparative Clinical profile, Anti-Fungal resistance rates and in-hospital mortality in hospitalized patients with Candidaemia caused by <i>Candida Auris</i> versus Non-Auris Candida in a tertiary-care centre
Date Crossref
29/01/2025
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityLeprosy Research and TreatmentMedical and Biological Ozone Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.