Aller au contenu principal
2025 conference-abstract

Exploring the role of bispecific and CAR-T cell therapies in gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
14Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, bg. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

465 Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is associated with significant mortality due to the limited efficacy of current conventional treatments, necessitating the need for novel therapies. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to explore the potential role and outcomes of bi-specific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) immunotherapy in treating GC. Methods: Using PRISMA guidelines, searches were conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrial.gov for 'Gastric cancers', 'bispecific antibodies', and 'CAR-T therapy' as of March 30, 2024. Out of 35 studies, 9 were selected for pooled analysis in R (v4.3.3) using the Der Simonian-Laird Estimator, calculating inter-study variance and extracting data with 95% CI. Results: 138 gastric cancer (GC) patients from 2 phase I (22.22%), 3 phase Ib (33.33%), 3 phase II (33.33%), and 1 case report (11.11%). Median age was 57 (28-77) years, and 76% (31/41) were male. Bispecific antibodies were MCLA-128 (25/138), catumaxomab (15/138), AK104 PD-1/CTLA-4 (16/138), ABL 001 DLL4VEGFA (19/138), and KN026 (25/138) while CART therapy was CT041 (38/138). The pooled overall response (OR), partial response (PR), and complete response (CR) for bispecific antibodies was 37% (95% CI, 0.12-0.71, I2=76%, n=100, p <0.01), 21% (95% CI,0.05-0.55, I2=73%, n=85, p<0.01), and 11%(95% CI, 0.02-0.38, I2=63%, n=85, p=0.03) respectively, while the pooled OR, PR, and CR for CART was 56% (95% CI, 0.40-0.71, I2=0%, n=38, p=0.41), 53%(95% CI, 0.36-0.69, I2=0%, n=38, p=0.38, ), and 12% (95% CI, 0.02-0.42, I2=38%, n=38 p=0.2), respectively. The pooled disease control rate was 75% (95%CI,0.46-0.92, I2=79%, n=80, p < 0.01) for bispecific antibodies and 27% (95% CI,0.16-0.40, I2=0%, n=65, p=0.37) had the stable disease while pooled incidence of progressive disease was 18% (95% CI,0.09-0.31, I2=0%, n=55, p=0.53). The median progressive free survival was 6.74 months, with a median overall survival of 14.75 months. Common adverse effects included anemia, diarrhea, fatigue, and cytokine release syndrome grades 1 or 2. Conclusions: This analysis shows promising results in GC patients using bi-specific antibodies and CAR-T cell therapy. However, further clinical trials are needed to fully explore their potential.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Exploring the role of bispecific and CAR-T cell therapies in gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Date Crossref
01/02/2025
Éditeur
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

CAR-T cell therapy researchBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.