An alternatively translated isoform of PPARG proposes AF-1 domain inhibition as an insulin sensitization target
Le résumé fourni par la source
PPARγ is the pharmacological target of thiazolidinediones (TZDs), potent insulin sensitizers that prevent metabolic disease morbidity but are accompanied by side effects such as weight gain, in part due to non-physiological transcriptional agonism. Using high throughput genome engineering, we targeted nonsense mutations to every exon of PPARG, finding an ATG in Exon 2 (chr3:12381414, CCDS2609 c.A403) that functions as an alternative translational start site. This downstream translation initiation site gives rise to a PPARγ protein isoform (M135), preferentially generated from alleles containing nonsense mutations upstream of c.A403. PPARγ M135 retains the DNA and ligand binding domains of full-length PPARγ but lacks the N-terminal AF-1 domain. Despite being truncated, PPARγ M135 shows increased transactivation of target genes, but only in the presence of agonists. Accordingly, human missense mutations disrupting AF-1 domain function actually increase agonist-induced cellular PPARγ activity compared to wild-type (WT), and carriers of these AF-1 disrupting variants are protected from metabolic syndrome. Thus, we propose the existence of PPARγ M135 as a fully functional, alternatively translated isoform that may be therapeutically generated to treat insulin resistance-related disorders.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- <b>An alternatively translated isoform of </b><b><i>PPARG</i></b><b> proposes AF-1 domain inhibition as an insulin sensitization target</b>
- Date Crossref
- 24/01/2025
- Éditeur
- American Diabetes Association
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.