Exosome-loading miR-205: a two-pronged approach to ocular neovascularization therapy
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Pathological neovascularization is a hallmark of many vision-threatening diseases. However, some patients exhibit poor responses to current anti-VEGF therapies due to resistance and limited efficacy. Recent studies have highlighted the roles of noncoding RNAs in various biological processes, paving the way for RNA-based therapeutics. In this study, we report a marked down-regulation of miR-205 under pathological conditions. miR-205 potently inhibits endothelial cell functions critical for pathological neovascularization, including proliferation, migration, and tube formation. Furthermore, miR-205 strengthens the endothelial barrier, thereby reducing vascular leakage. In mouse models of retinal and choroidal neovascularization, miR-205 administration effectively suppresses abnormal blood vessel formation and leakage. Mechanistically, miR-205 directly targets VEGFA and ANGPT2, which are key drivers of pathological neovascularization. To improve delivery, we successfully loaded miR-205 into exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells. This innovative approach avoids cytotoxicity while preserving therapeutic efficacy in both cellular and animal models. Collectively, our findings highlight miR-205 as a promising therapeutic for ocular neovascularization, with exosome delivery offering a novel and efficient strategy for treating vision-threatening vascular diseases.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Exosome-loading miR-205: a two-pronged approach to ocular neovascularization therapy
- Date Crossref
- 22/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.