Follow-up practices of Norwegian intensive care units: A descriptive survey
Rattachement africain : no. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
After critical illness, two-thirds of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors experience new or increased deterioration of physical, psychological and/or cognitive conditions. Follow-up of ICU survivors is therefore essential. However, no recent studies have described follow-up routines in Norway. This study aimed to describe follow-up practices in Norwegian ICUs, including follow-up consultations, practices related to the use of diaries and the roles of different professions in this approach. This is a descriptive survey, reported in accordance with the STROBE checklist for reporting observational studies, where one professional development nurse in each of the 35 out of 55 Norwegian ICUs completed a questionnaire (64% response rate). Eight units (23%) offered follow-up consultations and 10 units (29%) offered patient diaries. The nurses played a central role in the use of follow-up consultations and diaries, as nurses, for example, were the professionals who most often led follow-up consultations (6/7) and always (10/10) wrote in the diaries. To better plan for future follow-up and rehabilitation strategies for ICU survivors, it is important to identify the best type of follow-up practices and establish evidence-based guidelines, thus giving nurses sufficient recourses to perform the procedure.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Follow-up practices of Norwegian intensive care units: A descriptive survey
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2025
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.