Aller au contenu principal
2025 conference-paper

Insufficient control of cholestatic pruritus in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) with current therapies: baseline data from the ongoing Phase 3 GLISTEN (Global Linerixibat Itch STudy of Efficacy and safety iN PBC) trial

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
10Institutions déclarées
8Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : ca, us, gb, ch, jp, it, cn, mx. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Cholestatic pruritus is common in PBC, negatively impacts quality of life and efficacy of current therapies is limited. Linerixibat, an oral ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor, is currently in development for the treatment of pruritus in PBC. Here, we report baseline (BL) characteristics and pruritus treatment history in GLISTEN to characterize unmet patients’ needs. Methods: GLISTEN (NCT04950127) is an ongoing Phase 3, placebo-controlled study in adults with PBC and moderate–severe pruritus. Pruritus severity is assessed using a worst itch 0–10 numerical rating scale (NRS). Participants are either treatment-naïve, have received prior therapy or continue stable concomitant therapies for pruritus. A preliminary analysis of BL characteristics is presented. Results: Data from 227 participants were included. At BL, 42% had moderate pruritus (NRS 4-6), 58% severe (NRS≥7); 51% had alkaline phosphatase levels<1.67x upper limit of normal. The most common prior therapies for pruritus were antihistamines, bile acid binding resins, rifampin, and fibrates. Where specified, main reasons for stopping these treatments included lack of efficacy (83%, 55%, 69%, and 13%, respectively) and lack of tolerability (9%, 45%, 38%, and 88%, respectively). In total, 42% of participants were receiving concomitant therapy that may reduce pruritus, including 22% receiving fibrates. Conclusion: Prior use of bile acid binding resins was low in the GLISTEN population despite its first-line position in treatment guidelines. Regardless of the use of multiple “off label” therapies, participants had evidence of ongoing moderate–severe pruritus, underscoring the unmet need for a targeted therapy for pruritus in PBC. Publication History Article published online: 20 January 2025 © 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Insufficient control of cholestatic pruritus in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) with current therapies: baseline data from the ongoing Phase 3 GLISTEN (Global Linerixibat Itch STudy of Efficacy and safety iN PBC) trial
Date Crossref
01/01/2025
Éditeur
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Type
proceedings-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Liver Diseases and ImmunityInflammatory Bowel DiseaseHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.