Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Detection of Persistence of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in Local and Crossbred Cattle of Assam

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: This study aimed to investigate the persistence of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus (FMDV) in clinically recovered cattle following an outbreak, focusing on both local indigenous breeds (Lakhimi) and crossbred cattle (Holstein Friesian-cross) in Assam. Methods: A total of 129 cattle (36 local and 93 crossbred), clinically recovered from FMD, were included in the study. Oropharyngeal fluid (OPF) samples (n=178) were collected at various intervals post-recovery. FMDV detection was carried out using three molecular diagnostic techniques: Multiplex PCR, reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) and SYBR Green real-time PCR, all targeting the FMDV 3D gene. Result: FMDV was detected in 38 samples (21.35%) by multiplex PCR, 47 samples (26.40%) by RT-LAMP and 49 samples (27.53%) by SYBR Green real-time PCR. While all three methods showed comparable diagnostic accuracy, real-time PCR proved to be the most sensitive, rapid, reliable and cost-effective technique. FMDV persistence was observed in 24.81% (32/129) of cattle up to the 1st month post-recovery, 11.63% (15/129) up to the 3rd month and 1.55% (2/129) up to the 6th month. Local non-vaccinated Lakhimi cattle exhibited higher rates of viral persistence for serotype O, with 33.33% (12/36), 22.22% (8/36) and 5.55% (2/36) showing persistence at the 1st, 3rd and 6th months post-recovery, respectively. In contrast, vaccinated Holstein Friesian-cross cattle, demonstrated lower persistence rates, with 19.23% for Serotype A and 22.39% for Serotype O at the 1st month and 10.45% for Serotype O at the 3rd month post-recovery. Importantly, no transmission of the virus to healthy in-contact animals was detected during the study period. Statistical analysis (P=0.23, Chi-square=5.57) revealed no significant difference in viral persistence between local and crossbred cattle, suggesting that factors beyond vaccination status might influence FMDV persistence. However, the findings underscore the critical role of vaccination in reducing viral persistence in recovered cattle.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Detection of Persistence of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in Local and Crossbred Cattle of Assam
Date Crossref
18/01/2025
Éditeur
Agricultural Research Communication Center
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Animal Disease Management and EpidemiologyViral Infections and Immunology ResearchVector-Borne Animal Diseases

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.