Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of Pediatric Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Treatment Practices and Outcomes Prior to Pediatric American Thyroid Association Guidelines Implementation

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) is the most common pediatric thyroid malignancy, with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) representing 90% of the cases. In 2015, the American Thyroid Association (ATA) developed management guidelines for pediatric DTC. PROCEDURE: Patients less than 21 years of age diagnosed with DTC between 2000 and 2015 at Texas Children's Hospital, Seattle Children's Hospital, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Children's Hospital Colorado, and Nationwide Children's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate treatment practices before the implementation of the ATA guidelines. RESULTS: We included 216 pediatric patients with DTC. A majority were female (76%) with a median age at diagnosis of 14.8 years. Neck swelling (56%) and palpable nodules (49%) were common presenting symptoms. Diagnostic evaluations typically included thyroid ultrasound, with common features being microcalcifications (47.7%) and hypoechogenicity (39.0%). Fine-needle aspiration cytology confirmed diagnosis in 50.5%. The majority of patients underwent total thyroidectomy (78.7%) and lymph node dissection (75.5%). ATA risk stratification was low, intermediate, and high risk in 111 (51.4%), 29 (13.4%), and 76 patients (35.2%), respectively. Upfront radioactive iodine (RAI) was administered in 83%. At 1-year follow-up, 46% were disease-free (66% low risk, 59% intermediate risk, and 13% high risk). The 5-year progression-free survival for low, intermediate, and high risk were 86%, 53%, and 43%, respectively. The disease-related overall survival was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to the introduction of the ATA guidelines, a majority of patients underwent total thyroidectomy with lymph node dissection followed by RAI. Selective use of RAI for low-risk disease as recommended in the current guidelines may be appropriate.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.