The serum amyloid A to C-reactive protein ratio is lower in men than in women because of higher C-reactive protein concentrations in men
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: We previously found that discrepancy between serum amyloid A (SAA) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels linked to the difference of SAA/CRP ratio in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis, and the ratio varied among different patients. This study aimed to determine why the SAA/CRP ratio differed among different patients. METHODS: The patients (n = 466) with most of inflammatory diseases were enrolled. After examined CRP and SAA concentrations, we compared the SAA/CRP ratio, and SAA and CRP concentrations in men and women. RESULTS: The SAA/CRP ratio varied dramatically among different patients (33.6-0.140). The 10 highest SAA/CRP ratios were all in women, and half of the 10 lowest ratios were found in men. The loge SAA/CRP ratio was significantly higher in women than in men (P < .0001). The loge SAA concentration was not different between women and men (P = .174), but the loge CRP concentration was significantly higher in men (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The SAA/CRP ratio varies considerably among different patients. The SAA/CRP ratio in women is higher than in men because loge CRP but not SAA concentrations in men are higher than in women. The finding is against the conventional view and suggests that the reference range of CRP concentrations in women should be assessed lower than in men.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The serum amyloid A to C-reactive protein ratio is lower in men than in women because of higher C-reactive protein concentrations in men
- Date Crossref
- 17/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.