Not so great expectations: The role of price and name information in the nocebo effect
Rattachement africain : au, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background. The perception of taking a generic medication can result in reduced efficacy and increased side effects, despite equivalence to brand name medications under double blind conditions. It may be that cues typically associated with generics, including lower price and more complex name, exacerbate negative expectations and cause nocebo effects.Methods. Healthy participants (N=196) were randomised to receive sham-oxytocin nasal spray associated with either a generic (complex name, low price; n=66) or brand (simple name, high price; n=68) cue, or to no treatment control (n=62). Participants were informed that oxytocin could enhance trust and cooperation, but might cause side effects of headache, nausea, vomiting, rapid heartbeat, feeling faint or light-headed, and skin itching or rash. Treatment-related side effects were assessed at baseline, and after 3 days of sham-oxytocin use. Results. Nocebo effects were observed across sham-treated participants relative to control (p=.015; d=0.28). Association with a generic relative to branded cue significantly enhanced nocebo effects (p=.042; d=0.36). Negative expectations mediated the observed nocebo and branding effects. Conclusions. Cues associated with generic medications can exacerbate nocebo effects and these findings may explain clinical observations of increased side effects from generic medications. Results have important implications for medical care, and interventions to mitigate nocebo effects from generic medications are needed.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Not so great expectations: The role of price and name information in the nocebo effect
- Date Crossref
- 16/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Center for Open Science
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.