Pseudomonas superinfection drives Pf phage transmission within airway infections in patients with cystic fibrosis
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Pf bacteriophages, lysogenic viruses that infect Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa), are implicated in the pathogenesis of chronic Pa infections; phage-infected (Pf+) strains are known to predominate in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) who are older and have more severe disease. However, the transmission patterns of Pf underlying the progressive dominance of Pf+ strains are unclear. In particular, it is unknown whether phage transmission commonly occurs horizontally between bacteria within the airway via viral particles or if Pf+ bacteria are mostly acquired via new Pseudomonas infections. Here, we have studied Pa genomic sequences from 3 patient cohorts totaling 663 clinical isolates from 105 pwCF. We identify Pf+ isolates and analyze transmission patterns of Pf within patients between genetically similar groups of bacteria called “clone types”. We find that Pf is predominantly passed down vertically within Pa lineages and rarely via horizontal transfer between clone types within the airway. Conversely, we find extensive evidence of Pa superinfection by a new, genetically distinct Pa that is Pf+. Finally, we find that clinical isolates show reduced activity of the type IV pilus and reduced susceptibility to Pf in vitro. These results cast new light on the transmission of virulence-associated phages in the clinical setting.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- <i>Pseudomonas</i> superinfection drives Pf phage transmission within airway infections in patients with cystic fibrosis
- Date Crossref
- 15/01/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.