Early Screening of Autism in Toddlers via Express-Needs-With-Pointing Protocol
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The incidence of autism spectrum disorders (ASD), a neurodevelopmental condition associated with challenges in social communication, has witnessed a remarkable surge in recent years, with adverse effects on individuals, families, and society at large. Early screening for autism ensures timely access to interventions, yet screening lacks systematic and methodical approaches for objectively quantifying social behaviors. In response to this, we propose a protocol for early assistive screening, termed the Express-Needs-with-Pointing (ENP), which employs a multi-sensor platform to quantify the one of the social skills of toddler. A vision-based pointing behavior detection method is proposed, combining gaze estimation and pointing estimation, where the pointing estimation integrates forearm orientation and finger direction. We conduct an experiment involving twenty toddlers aged between 16 and 32 months, 4 of whom are typically developing (TD) children, 6 diagnosed with ASD, 8 diagnosed with global developmental delay (GDD), and 5 diagnosed with language disorders (LD). The results demonstrate that the automated assessment methods for pointing behavior achieved an impressive accuracy rate of 93.9%. These findings provide compelling evidence that the ENP is one of the highly effective protocols and holds significant implications for assisting in early autism screening.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Early Screening of Autism in Toddlers via Express-Needs-With-Pointing Protocol
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.