Centanafadine Sustained Release Is Efficacious in Patients with Adult ADHD, Regardless of Their Treatment History

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction Centanafadine (CTN) is a potential first-in-class norepinephrine/dopamine/serotonin triple reuptake inhibitor (NDSRI) that has demonstrated efficacy, safety, and tolerability vs placebo (PBO) in adults with ADHD in 2 pivotal phase 3 trials (Adler LA, et al. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022;42:429-39). Methods Pooled data from 2 double-blind, multicenter, PBO-controlled trials enrolling adults (18–55 years) meeting DSM-5 ADHD criteria were analyzed. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to CTN sustained release (SR) 200 mg or 400 mg total daily dose (TDD) or matching PBO if Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) score was ≥28 at screening (if not receiving pharmacologic ADHD treatment) or ≥22 at screening and ≥28 at baseline (if receiving treatment). Having had no prior benefit from ≥2 ADHD therapies of different classes, use of prohibited medications, and positive alcohol/drug screens were exclusionary. Studies had 4 periods: (1) screening and washout (≤28 days), (2) single-blind PBO run-in (1 week), (3) double-blind treatment (6 weeks), and (4) follow-up (10 days after last dose). Patients with ≥30% Adult ADHD Self-report Scale (ASRS) improvement from start to end of screening were screen failures; those with ≥30% ASRS improvement from start to end of PBO run-in were terminated early. A mixed model for repeated measures analysis evaluated CTN SR vs PBO based on ADHD treatment history; least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline (BL) in AISRS at day 42 was the outcome of interest. Results In total, 859 patients were analyzed (CTN SR 200 mg TDD, n=287; 400 mg TDD, n=287; PBO, n=285). LSM change from BL in AISRS score was significant at day 42 for each CTN SR TDD group (both, P<0.001) in the overall population vs PBO. Among patients with prior stimulant/nonstimulant treatment (n=542), LSM change from BL was significant at day 42 vs PBO in the CTN SR 200 mg (P=0.016) and 400 mg (P=0.008) TDD groups. Although cohort size was limited (n=47), LSM change from baseline with CTN SR 400 mg TDD was significant (P<0.05) from days 14 to 42 in those who took 2 prior stimulant/nonstimulant treatments, with P=0.030 at day 42. In those with no prior stimulant/nonstimulant treatment (n=317), LSM change from BL was significant at day 42 for the CTN SR 200 mg (P=0.007) and 400 mg (P=0.008) TDD groups vs PBO. When analyzed by history of any past stimulant use, LSM change from BL was significant at day 42 for CTN 200 mg (n=179; P=0.013) and 400 mg (n=166; P=0.006), with significance (P<0.05) noted at day 7 (200 mg TDD) and at day 21 (400 mg TDD), remaining significant to day 42. Conclusions This pooled analysis suggests that CTN SR treatment is efficacious in adults with ADHD, regardless of prior treatments, an encouraging finding given reported adult ADHD treatment patterns. Study Registration: NCT03605680, NCT03605836 Funding Otsuka

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.