Determining the Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of 4 Ultrasound Scores in Crohn's Disease Assessment: Correlations With Endoscopy

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS) is recommended for monitoring Crohn's disease (CD). GIUS scores are used to quantify CD activity. Among them, International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score (IBUS-SAS), Bowel Ultrasound Score (BUSS), Simple Ultrasound Score, and Simple Ultrasound Score for Crohn's Disease are most commonly used. The aim of this study was to compare and correlate the performance of such indicators with endoscopic activity and to calculate interobserver agreement. METHODS: Consecutive patients with CD at our hospital between June 2015 and July 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. All patients underwent ileocolonoscopy after medical treatment. GIUS was performed within 2 weeks, and 4 GIUS scores were independently calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to determine a cutoff value. Cohen kappa (κ) coefficient was calculated to estimate the agreement between GIUS findings. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients with CD were enrolled. 80.2% (85/106) were endoscopic active (Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease ≥3), and 8.49% (9/106) were severe cases (Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease ≥9). All GIUS features (bowel wall thickness, color Doppler signs, bowel wall stratification, inflammatory signals at the mesentery) were statistically significant in assessing CD activity ( P < 0.05). IBUS-SAS showed the highest area under the curve (0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-1.00) and specificity (95.2%) for a cutoff value of 46.50. However, IBUS-SAS had only moderate agreement (Cohen κ = 0.427; P < 0.001). BUSS had substantial interobserver agreement (Cohen κ = 0.947; P < 0.001), with a similar diagnostic value (sensitivity, 100.0%; accuracy, 95.3%; area under the curve of 0.96 [95% CI: 0.91-1.00] for a cutoff value of 4.58). DISCUSSION: GIUS score is an efficient and reliable method to assess CD activity. BUSS achieved a high accuracy and excellent interobserver agreement, which is more suitable for treatment assessment.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.