Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Utilization and quality of primary and specialized palliative homecare in nursing home residents vs. community dwellers: a claims data analysis

6Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
6Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: There are hardly any data on the extent to which nursing home residents are provided with palliative homecare. We want to add evidence by comparing nursing home residents (who had been living in a nursing home for at least one year) and nursing-care-dependent community dwellers in terms of utilization and quality of palliative homecare. METHODS: We conducted a population-based study with nationwide claims data from deceased beneficiaries of a large German health insurance provider. First, we compared utilization rates of primary palliative care [PPC], specialized palliative homecare [SPHC], and no palliative care [noPC] between nursing home residents and community dwellers, both descriptively and adjusted for covariates. Second, we analyzed the (adjusted) relationship between PPC-only and SPHC (both: starting ≥ 30 days before death), and noPC with healthcare indicators (death in hospital, hospitalization, emergencies, intensive care treatment within the last 30 days of life), and compared these relationships between nursing home residents and community dwellers. Analyses were conducted using simple and multiple logistic regression. Data were standardized by age and gender. RESULTS: From 117,436 decedents in 2019, 71,803‬ could be included in the first, 55,367‬ in the second analysis. The rate of decedents with noPC was higher in nursing home residents (61.3%) compared to community dwellers (56.6%). Nursing home residents received less SPHC (10.7% vs. 23.2%) but more PPC (30.3% vs. 27.0%) than community dwellers, and achieved better outcomes across all end-of-life healthcare indicators. Adjusted for covariates, both types of palliative homecare were associated with beneficial outcomes, in nursing home residents as well as in community dwellers, with generally better outcomes for SPHC than PPC-only. For most outcomes, the associations with palliative homecare were equal or smaller in nursing home residents than in community dwellers. CONCLUSIONS: The overall better performance in quality of end-of-life care in nursing home residents than in community dwellers may be due to the institutionally provided nursing and general practitioner care within nursing homes. This may also explain higher rates of PPC and lower rates of SPHC in nursing home residents, and why the relationship with both PPC and SPHC are smaller in nursing home residents. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): [DRKS00024133, Date of registration: 28.06.2021].

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Utilization and quality of primary and specialized palliative homecare in nursing home residents vs. community dwellers: a claims data analysis
Date Crossref
07/01/2025
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Jena University Hospital Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • BARMER GEK pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Institute of Health and Nursing Sciences pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • University of Augsburg Center for Interdisciplinary Health Research pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care pays non établi dans la notice
    Structure de recherche

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine — Jena University Hospital et Friedrich Schiller University Jena, avec 4 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFrailty in Older Adults

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.