Proposal: Bold New Indications for Transcatheter Pulmonary Flow Restrictors
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This proposal presents a proof of concept for the use of pulmonary flow restrictors (PFRs) based on MVP™-devices, drawing from clinical experience, and explores their potential role in the management of newborns with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS), other complex left heart lesions, and infants with end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). At this early stage of age, manually adjusted PFRs can be tailored to patient's size and hemodynamic needs. Although currently used off-label, PFRs have substantial potential to improve outcomes in these vulnerable patient populations. When integrated into a holistic treatment strategy, they represent a promising advancement in care. There is significant potential to reduce mortality and improve the quality of life for neonates with HLHS and variants, as well as to support age-dependent functional regeneration in DCM, all while avoiding the need for advanced surgical procedures, including general anesthesia. The main barrier to broader adoption is the limited availability of appropriately sized MVP devices. However, with ongoing patient-centered knowledge sharing and refinement of transcatheter techniques, there is reason for optimism that PFRs, tailored for individual patients, could provide significant benefits to thousands of infants with congenital heart disease and DCM worldwide.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Proposal: Bold New Indications for Transcatheter Pulmonary Flow Restrictors
- Date Crossref
- 05/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.