Exploring the Impact of Amidation Status in Meso-Diaminopimelic-Acid-Containing Disaccharide Peptidoglycan Fragments on Host Innate Immune Activation

Résumé fourni par la source

Bacterial peptidoglycan, the essential cell surface polymer that protects bacterial integrity, also serves as the molecular pattern recognized by the host’s innate immune system. Although the minimal motifs of bacterial peptidoglycan fragments (PGNs) that activate mammalian NOD1 and NOD2 sensors are well-known and often represented by small canonical ligands, the immunostimulatory effects of natural PGNs, which are structurally more complex and potentially can simultaneously activate both the NOD1 and NOD2 signaling pathways in hosts, have not been comprehensively investigated. In particular, many bacteria incorporate additional structural modifications in peptidoglycans to evade host immune surveillance, resulting in diverse structural variations among natural PGNs that may influence their biological effects in hosts. The focus of this study is on the amidation status of γ- d -glutamic acid and meso -diaminopimelic acid (mDAP) at the second and third positions of stem peptides in peptidoglycan, which represent key structural features that vary across different bacterial species. With four synthetic mDAP-containing disaccharide PGNs of different amidation states, we systematically investigated their structure–activity relationship in stimulating host innate immune responses in vitro . Our findings revealed that the amidation of disaccharide PGNs has distinct effects on NOD1 and NOD2 induction, along with their differential immunostimulatory activities in macrophage cells. Additionally, we found that, like the canonical NOD2 ligand, natural PGNs confer immune tolerance to LPS, and amidation states do not affect this outcome. Overall, our work highlights the potential immunological implications of these differentially amidated mDAP-type disaccharide PGNs in host–microbe crosstalk.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.