Increasing Importance of Local Hydroclimatology During the Tundra Growing Season in the Yukon–Kuskokwim Delta
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Changing precipitation patterns in the Arctic is a key indicator of climate change, in addition to increasing land and ocean temperatures, but these patterns are not uniform across the circumpolar region. This regional analysis focuses on the Yukon–Kuskokwim Delta in southwestern Alaska and addresses the following questions: (1) What is the baseline hydroclimatology during the growing season on the Yukon–Kuskokwim Delta? (2) What are the seasonal and intraseasonal trends of the hydroclimate variables in the YKD? (3) What are the implications of documented trends for the study region? Utilizing ECMWF’s ERA5 reanalysis dataset, we conducted a seasonal analysis for May through September for the years 1982–2022. While no strong trend emerged for total precipitation over the 41-year study period, differing trends were observed for large-scale and convective precipitation. The decline in large-scale precipitation is supported by a decrease in storm counts in the Bering Sea, as well as declining vertically integrated moisture convergence and moisture flux. By contrast, the increase in convective precipitation underscores the growing importance of the local hydrologic cycle, further supported by a significant rise in evaporation. These enhanced local hydroclimatological cycles have significant implications for wildfires and subsistence activities.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Increasing Importance of Local Hydroclimatology During the Tundra Growing Season in the Yukon–Kuskokwim Delta
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.