Discharge Against Medical Advice in Cancer Patients: Insights from a Multicenter Study in Germany
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Discharge against medical advice (DAMA) disrupts continuity of care and is associated with increased readmission rates, morbidity, and mortality. While extensively studied in general hospital populations, its prevalence and associated factors in cancer patients, where treatment adherence is critical for outcomes, remain underexplored. METHODS: This multicenter, cross-sectional study analyzed anonymized data from the IQVIA hospital database, including cancer patients hospitalized in 36 German hospitals between January 2019 and December 2023. Multivariate logistic regression assessed associations between DAMA and factors such as age, sex, cancer type, metastases, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Among 51,505 cancer patients, DAMA occurred in 0.9% of hospitalizations. The highest rates were observed in cancers of the lip, oral cavity, and pharynx (2.1%), larynx (2.0%), and liver (1.8%). DAMA was more frequent in younger patients (≤50 years) (OR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.30-2.14) and males (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.23-1.72). Distant metastases showed no significant association (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.81-1.13). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that DAMA in cancer patients is more strongly associated with demographic and social factors than with disease severity. These results provide a basis for exploring strategies that address underlying psychosocial and economic challenges during hospitalization, particularly in younger and male patients. Further research is needed to better understand these associations and their implications for clinical practice.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Discharge Against Medical Advice in Cancer Patients: Insights from a Multicenter Study in Germany
- Date Crossref
- 28/12/2024
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.