Association of Baseline Lipopolysaccharide-Binding Protein with Expanded Disability Status Score Dynamics in Patients with Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study
Rattachement africain : lv. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Forecasting the progression of the disease in the early inflammatory stage of the most prevalent type of multiple sclerosis (MS), referred to as relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), is essential for making prompt treatment modifications, aimed to reduce clinical relapses and disability. In total, 58 patients with RRMS, having an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score less than 4, were included in this study. Baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed, and brain and spinal cord lesions were evaluated. The disability of the patients was evaluated using EDSS at baseline and follow-up; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were also used to determine the level of blood-based inflammation markers in plasma at baseline. The main results demonstrated that the baseline level of LBP was correlated with an increase in EDSS in a short (8-10 months) follow-up period. Furthermore, the prognostic significance of LBP was only observed in patients who received disease-modifying treatment (DMT) before the study. Our results suggest that the baseline level of LBP may be among the predictors of disability progression in RRMS over short follow-up periods, particularly in those receiving treatment. It highlights the effect of endotoxins in the pathogenesis of RRMS.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Association of Baseline Lipopolysaccharide-Binding Protein with Expanded Disability Status Score Dynamics in Patients with Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study
- Date Crossref
- 31/12/2024
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.