CPDM: Content-preserving diffusion model for underwater image enhancement
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Underwater image enhancement (UIE) is challenging since image degradation in aquatic environments is complicated and changing over time. Existing mainstream methods rely on either physical-model or data-driven, suffering from performance bottlenecks due to changes in imaging conditions or training instability. In this article, we attempt to adapt the diffusion model to the UIE task and propose a Content-Preserving Diffusion Model (CPDM) to address the above challenges. CPDM first leverages a diffusion model as its fundamental model for stable training and then designs a content-preserving framework to deal with changes in imaging conditions. Specifically, we construct a conditional input module by adopting both the raw image and the difference between the raw and noisy images as the input at each time step of the diffusion process, which can enhance the model's adaptability by considering the changes involving the raw images in underwater environments. To preserve the essential content of the raw images, we construct a content compensation module for content-aware training by extracting low-level image features of the raw images as compensation for each down block. We conducted tests on the LSUI, UIEB, and EUVP datasets, and the results show that CPDM outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both subjective and objective metrics, achieving the best overall performance. The GitHub link for the code is https://github.com/GZHU-DVL/CPDM.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- CPDM: Content-preserving diffusion model for underwater image enhancement
- Date Crossref
- 28/12/2024
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.