Intestinal ultrasound at diagnosis of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease compared to endoscopy

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVES: Intestinal ultrasound (IU) has emerged as an alternative to detect bowel wall inflammation. The aim of this study was to compare IU findings to clinical disease, fecal calprotectin (FC), and endoscopic findings in newly diagnosed pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. METHODS: This study was a 1-year, single-center, prospective study. Any pediatric patient undergoing colonoscopy could be recruited. Following ileo-colonoscopy, subjects were divided into two groups: patients diagnosed with IBD and patients without IBD. Participants had an IU within 1 month. Endoscopists and radiologists were blinded to each other. The IU findings were compared with clinical disease activity, FC, and endoscopic findings. RESULTS: A total of 50 subjects were enrolled in the study; 29 (58%) were females, median age was 13.5 years, and 25 (50%) were diagnosed with IBD. IU sensitivity was 76%, specificity 84%, positive predictive value (PPV) 83%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 78%. For detection of moderate to severe disease, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 91.3%, 86.21%, 84%, and 92.6%, respectively. A significant correlation was noted between IU and FC, Mayo score, and Simple Endoscopic Score (0.513, 0.565, and 0.731, respectively). Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index and Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index scores had Pearson correlations of 0.070 and -0.159, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IU can be considered a screening tool for pediatric IBD. It has reasonable sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV, particularly for moderate-to-severe disease. The severity noted on IU correlated with FC and endoscopic disease activity but did not correlate with clinical disease activity.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.