Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 peer-review

Comment on essd-2024-519

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
99Institutions déclarées
18Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : fr, gb, no, de, be, nl, au, us, ca, bm, ar, jp, Afrique du Sud, cn, at, it, ch, es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract. Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere in a changing climate is critical to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe and synthesise datasets and methodologies to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO2 emissions (EFOS) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land-use change (ELUC) are based on land-use and land-use change data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured directly, and its growth rate (GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) is estimated with global ocean biogeochemistry models and observation-based fCO2-products. The terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND) is estimated with dynamic global vegetation models. Additional lines of evidence on land and ocean sinks are provided by atmospheric inversions, atmospheric oxygen measurements and Earth System Models. The sum of all sources and sinks results in the carbon budget imbalance (BIM), a measure of imperfect data and incomplete understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ. For the year 2023, EFOS increased by 1.3 % relative to 2022, with fossil emissions at 10.1 ± 0.5 GtC yr-1 (10.3 ± 0.5 GtC yr-1 when the cement carbonation sink is not included), ELUC was 1.0 ± 0.7 GtC yr-1, for a total anthropogenic CO2 emission (including the cement carbonation sink) of 11.1 ± 0.9 GtC yr-1 (40.6 ± 3.2 GtCO2 yr-1). Also, for 2023, GATM was 5.9 ± 0.2 GtC yr-1 (2.79 ± 0.1 ppm yr-1), SOCEAN was 2.9 ± 0.4 GtC yr-1 and SLAND was 2.3 ± 1.0 GtC yr-1, with a near zero BIM (-0.02 GtC yr-1). The global atmospheric CO2 concentration averaged over 2023 reached 419.3 ± 0.1 ppm. Preliminary data for 2024, suggest an increase in EFOS relative to 2023 of +0.8 % (-0.3 % to 1.9 %) globally, and atmospheric CO2 concentration increased by 2.8 ppm reaching 422.5 ppm, 52 % above pre-industrial level (around 278 ppm in 1750). Overall, the mean and trend in the components of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period 1959–2023, with a near-zero overall budget imbalance, although discrepancies of up to around 1 GtC yr-1 persist for the representation of annual to semi-decadal variability in CO2 fluxes. Comparison of estimates from multiple approaches and observations shows: (1) a persistent large uncertainty in the estimate of land-use changes emissions, (2) a low agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO2 flux in the northern extra-tropics, and (3) a discrepancy between the different methods on the mean ocean sink. This living data update documents changes in methods and datasets applied to this most-recent global carbon budget as well as evolving community understanding of the global carbon cycle. The data presented in this work are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2024 (Friedlingstein et al., 2024).

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comment on essd-2024-519
Date Crossref
22/12/2024
Éditeur
Copernicus GmbH
Type
peer-review

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueÉcole PolytechniqueUniversity of ExeterSorbonne UniversitéLaboratoire de Météorologie DynamiqueInstitut Pierre-Simon LaplaceUniversity of East AngliaNorwich Research ParkTyndall CentreCICERO Center for International Climate ResearchAlfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und MeeresforschungUniversity of BremenFlanders Marine InstituteHelmholtz-Zentrum HereonMax Planck Institute for MeteorologyWageningen University & ResearchBjerknes Centre for Climate ResearchUniversity of BergenUniversity of GroningenLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationEcosystem SciencesUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-YvelinesCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies AlternativesUniversité Paris-SaclayLaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'EnvironnementCEA Paris-SaclayForest InstituteStanford UniversityNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNOAA Pacific Marine Environmental LaboratoryKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaBermuda Institute of Ocean SciencesUniversity of ReadingInstituto Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo PesqueroLeibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research WarnemündeTula FoundationCSIRO Oceans and AtmosphereJapan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and TechnologyUniversity of Maryland, College ParkEarth System Science Interdisciplinary CenterUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-PyrénéesCentre National de Recherches MétéorologiquesMétéo-FranceStellenbosch UniversityTsinghua UniversityJapan Meteorological AgencyLamont-Doherty Earth ObservatoryNSF National Center for Atmospheric ResearchNSF NCAR Climate and Global Dynamics LaboratoryInternational Institute for Applied Systems AnalysisJoint Research CentreETH ZurichAppalachian State UniversityLeibniz AssociationPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact ResearchUniversität HamburgCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental SciencesUrbana UniversityNanjing UniversityChinese Academy of SciencesPeking UniversityInstitute of Tibetan Plateau ResearchInstitute of Applied EnergyScripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California San DiegoUtrecht UniversityWestern Sydney UniversityNORCE Research ASLaboratoire d'Océanographie et du Climat : Expérimentations et Approches NumériquesInstitut de Recherche pour le DéveloppementCalifornia Institute of TechnologyJet Propulsion LaboratoryNational Institute for Environmental StudiesLaboratoire d’Océanographie de VillefrancheNational Centre for Atmospheric ScienceUniversity of Alaska FairbanksJapan Fisheries Research and Education AgencyNational Centre for Earth ObservationUniversity of EdinburghNOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological LaboratoriesSun Yat-sen UniversityPrinceton UniversityMax Planck Institute for BiogeochemistryUniversity of OxfordGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research KielOeschger Centre for Climate Change ResearchBoston CollegeUniversity of TasmaniaAustralian Antarctic DivisionBarcelona Supercomputing CenterUniversitat Politècnica de CatalunyaMeteorological Research InstituteFood and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsInstitute of Atmospheric PhysicsOak Ridge National LaboratoryNanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyNOAA Oceanic and Atmospheric Research

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.