Chemoradiation for human papillomavirus positive oropharyngeal cancer in smokers: A single-institutional experience
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE: To determine how smoking intensity impacts the prognosis of patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancer treated by chemoradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The medical records of 32 patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx and a prior smoking history were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy to a median dose of 70 Gy (range 63 to 72 Gy) with concurrent cisplatin. Seventeen patients (53 %) had stage II disease; and 15 patients (47 %) had stage III disease. Distribution of T-classification was: T1 8 (25 %); T2 4 (13 %); T3 10 (31 %); and T4 10 (31 %). Smoking history was categorized as follows: ≤10 pack-years (10 patients); 10-20 pack-years (6 patients); 20-30 pack-years (7 patients); >30 pack-years (9 patients). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 40 months (range, 6 to 121 months), the 3-year overall survival for the entire population was 79 %. Significant differences in 3-year overall survival (83 % vs 54 %, p = 0.01), local-regional control (86 % vs 62 %, p < 0.001), and progression-free survival (75 % vs 52 %, p = 0.02) were observed when comparing patients with ≤30 pack-year versus those with >30 pack-year smoking histories. CONCLUSION: The deleterious effect of smoking seemed to be most impactful in those with heavy consumption (i.e., >30 pack-year history).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Chemoradiation for human papillomavirus positive oropharyngeal cancer in smokers: A single-institutional experience
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.