Interventions for Cognitive Frailty: developing a Delphi consensus with multidisciplinary and multisectoral experts
Rattachement africain : gb, il, fr, es, pl, ca, br. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: The conjunction of physical frailty and cognitive impairment without dementia is described as Cognitive Frailty (CF). Indications that CF is potentially reversible have led to proposals that risk factors, symptoms or mechanisms of CF would be appropriate targets for interventions for prevention, delay or reversal. However, no study has brought experts together across sectors to determine targets, content or mode of interventions, and most resources on interventions are from the perspective of academic or clinical researchers only. This international Delphi consensus study brings together experts from academic and clinical research, lay people with lived experience of CF, informal carers, and professional care practitioners/clinicians.Methods: Three rounds of Delphi study were held to discern which factors and statements were agreed upon by the whole sample and which generated different views in those with differing expertise. A scoping review and Round 1 (29 participants) were used to gather initial statements. In Round 2, 58 people responded to statements and open text items, comprising 7 lab-based researchers, 27 researchers working with people, 14 people with lived experience or informal family carers, and 10 professional carers/clinicians. Percent agreement and qualitative responses were analysed to provide a final set of statements which were checked by 38 respondents in Round 3.Results: Analysis of Round 2 quantitative data provided 74 statements on which there was at least 70% agreement and qualitative data produced a further 24 statements. These were combined to provide 90 statements for Round 3. There was Consensus for 89 of the statements. A few differences between the groups were observed at both stages.Discussion and Conclusion: The consensus for statements associated with CF interventions provides a useful first step in defining health promotion activities and interventions. Given the prevalence and potential disability caused by CF in older populations, the consensus statements represent expert opinion that is inter-sectoral and will inform public health policies to support implementation of evidence-based prevention and intervention plans. This study is an important step towards changing current approaches, by including all stakeholders from the outset. Outcomes can be used to feed into co-creation of interventions for cognitive frailty.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Interventions for Cognitive Frailty: developing a Delphi consensus with multidisciplinary and multisectoral experts
- Date Crossref
- 20/12/2024
- Éditeur
- Center for Open Science
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Lancaster University Centre for Ageing Research (C4AR) pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Sheffield Hallam University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Bedfordshire Institute of Health Research pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Durham University Wolfson Institute for Health & Wellbeing pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Bar-Ilan University Department of Social Work pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Aston Medical (France) pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
-
Aston University Aston Research Centre for Health in Ageing pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Heriot-Watt University Department of Psychology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
St Mary's University Twickenham London pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
SGH Warsaw School of Economics pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Simon Fraser University STAR Institute pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Centre for Ageing Research (C4AR) — Lancaster University, Sheffield Hallam University et Institute of Health Research — University of Bedfordshire, avec 9 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.