Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 article

Mycobiome analyses of critically ill COVID-19 patients

6Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
12Institutions déclarées
6Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

ABSTRACT Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) is a life-threatening complication in patients with severe COVID-19. Previously, acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with COVID-19 has been associated with lung fungal dysbiosis, evidenced by reduced microbial diversity and Candida colonization. Increased fungal burden in the lungs of critically ill COVID-19 patients is linked to prolonged mechanical ventilation and increased mortality. However, specific mycobiome signatures associated with severe COVID-19 in the context of survival and antifungal drug prophylaxis have not yet been determined, and such knowledge could have an important impact on treatment. To understand the composition of the respiratory mycobiome in critically ill COVID-19 patients with and without CAPA and the impact of antifungal use in patient outcome, we performed a multinational study of 39 COVID-19 patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Respiratory mycobiome was profiled using internal transcribed spacer 1 sequencing, and Aspergillus fumigatus burden was further validated using quantitative PCR. Fungal communities were investigated using alpha diversity, beta diversity, taxa predominance, and taxa abundances. Respiratory mycobiomes of COVID-19 patients were dominated by Candida and Aspergillus . There was no significant association with corticosteroid use or CAPA diagnosis and respiratory fungal communities. Increased A. fumigatus burden was associated with mortality and, the use of azoles at ICU admission was linked with an absence of A. fumigatus . Our findings suggest that mold-active antifungal treatment at ICU admission may be linked with reduced A. fumigatus- associated mortality in severe COVID-19. However, further studies are warranted on this topic. IMPORTANCE Invasive fungal infections are a serious complication affecting up to a third of patients with severe COVID-19. Nevertheless, our understanding of the fungal communities in the lungs during critically ill COVID-19 remains limited. Evidence suggests a higher fungal burden is associated with prolonged ventilation and higher mortality, although the particular organisms responsible for this link are unclear. Antifungal prophylaxis may be beneficial for reducing the burden of fungal co-infections in COVID-19 intensive care. However, the composition of the fungal microbiome in severe COVID-19 in relation to prophylactic antifungals, as well as how this is associated with survival outcomes, is yet to be studied. Our study provides insights into the lung fungal microbiome in severe COVID-19 and has found antifungal treatment to be associated with lower Aspergillus fumigatus burden and that higher levels of this pathogen are associated with mortality. Therefore, our study suggests mold-active antifungal prophylaxis may be beneficial in severe COVID-19.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Mycobiome analyses of critically ill COVID-19 patients
Date Crossref
04/02/2025
Éditeur
American Society for Microbiology
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Gut microbiota and healthAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.