Identification of novel plasma proteomic biomarkers of Dupuytren Disease
Rattachement africain : us, dk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Dupuytren Disease (DD) is a chronic progressive disease that can cause disabling hand deformities. The most common treatments have high rates of complications and early recurrence. Dupuytren lacks a staging biomarker profile to develop preventive therapeutics to improve long-term outcomes. This multi-omic study aimed to create a DD blood proteomic biomarker profile by comparing DD plasma to a healthy control group. We measured circulating collagen metabolism peptides and found normal Collagen I synthesis but impaired Collagen I degradation in DD. We measured 6995 serum protein aptamers and identified 68 proteins with statistically significant differences from the control group. We developed two Diagnostic Proteomic Risk Scores (DPRS) based on hypothesis-free and hypothesis-based analyses. In independent data, our hypothesis-free and hypothesis-based DPRS distinguished Dupuytren from control subjects with 76.5% and 70.6% accuracy, respectively. Our hypothesis-based DPRS also distinguished DD subjects with different disease progression rates based on subject age at the time of their first corrective procedure (p=0.0018). This pilot study is the first to provide evidence that Collagen I accumulation in DD is due to impaired degradation rather than increased collagen synthesis. It also describes novel DPRS that have potential use as diagnostic and staging biomarker panels for Dupuytren disease.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Identification of novel plasma proteomic biomarkers of Dupuytren Disease
- Date Crossref
- 16/12/2024
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.