Immunoprophylaxis with MV140 Is Effective in the Reduction of Urinary Tract Infections—A Prospective Real-Life Study

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background/Objectives: Urinary tract infections (UTI) represent a highly frequent and debilitating disease. Immunoactive prophylaxis, such as the polyvalent bacterial whole-cell-based sublingual vaccine MV140, have been developed to avoid antibiotic use. However, the effectiveness of this tool in the Portuguese population is still unknown. This study aims at assessing the effectiveness of treatment with MV140 in a cohort of Portuguese patients presenting with recurrent UTIs. Methods: Prospective observational real-life study of 125 patients with complicated and uncomplicated recurrent UTIs treated with MV140. The primary outcome was a reduction in frequency and severity of UTIs after a follow-up of 12 months. Overall satisfaction, adverse events, and assessment of the effectiveness of MV140 in subgroups of patients with specific risk factors for UTIs were secondary outcomes. Results: In the 12 months after treatment outset, 38% of patients were UTI-free, 34% reported 1 or 2 UTI episodes, and the remaining 28% presented 3 or more UTIs, corresponding to a mean reduction of 3.20 (2.87–3.53, 95% C.I.; p < 0.001) UTI episodes per year per patient. The effectiveness of MV140 was the same regardless of sex, BMI, regular sexual activity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, depression, paraplegia, performance of intermittent self-catheterization, indwelling bladder catheter, or previous use of other UTI-preventing vaccines. We observed a higher effectiveness in post-menopausal women compared to pre-menopausal (74.7% vs. 59.4%, respectively, p = 0.029). A total of 73% of patients reported a reduction in symptom severity or days of disease, and the mean global satisfaction was 7.52/10. Conclusions: MV140 demonstrated to be effective in the reduction rate of recurrent UTIs in a cohort of adult Portuguese patients.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.