Longitudinal Insights Into Childhood Onset Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy
Rattachement africain : nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) is an inherited muscle disorder, with childhood onset in 20% of patients. Understanding the natural history of childhood FSHD and identifying clinical and functional outcome measures are crucial for clinical care and future trials. METHODS: In a prospective nationwide FSHD cohort study (iFocus), 20 childhood-onset patients were assessed at baseline, 2 years, and 5 years. Assessments included manual muscle and functional muscle tests, FSHD clinical score (FSHD-CS), FSHD clinical severity scale (FSHD-CSS), and muscle ultrasonography (MUS). RESULTS: Eighteen patients (aged 2-17 years at baseline) completed the 5-year follow-up. Disease progression varied, with a mean FSHD-CS increase of 1.6. Despite objective disease progression, most participants (89%) did not perceive change. The most sensitive outcome measures were FSHD-CS (standardized response mean [SRM] 1.07), FSHD-CSS score (SRM 0.92), and MUS findings (SRM 0.68). Baseline characteristics did not predict progression. DISCUSSION: Disease progression was variable and often remained unnoticed by participants. Quality of life improved, and fatigue levels decreased over 5 years. The relatively slow progression and physiologic growth highlight the need for sensitive end points within a 1-2-year time frame. Future pediatric studies should consider larger international cohorts, assess reachable workspace, and include MUS and FSHD functional composite outcome measure (FSHD-COM).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Longitudinal Insights Into Childhood Onset Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy
- Date Crossref
- 14/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.