Acridone Derivatives as Photosystem II Inhibitors: Synthesis, Herbicidal Activity, and Structure-Activity
Le résumé fourni par la source
In this study, we report the synthesis of acridone derivatives and their potential as photosystem II (PSII) inhibitors, as well as their pre- and post-emergence herbicidal activities through chlorophyll a fluorescence and germination assays. Among the compounds tested for PSII activity, acridin-9(10H)-one showed the most promising results, reducing the performance index on an absorption basis and decreasing the quantum yield for electron transport compared to the control. These findings suggest an inhibitory effect on PSII within the electron transport chain. Additionally, 2-chloroacridin-9(10H)-one and 9(10H)-acridone-4-carboxylic acid exhibited post-emergence herbicidal activity against Amaranthus lividus and Amaranthus viridis weeds, respectively, leading to a reduction in radicle and hypocotyl lengths. Furthermore, we applied a molecular docking approach with the D1 protein and 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase to investigate the structure-activity relationships among the acridone derivatives with these enzymes. The analysis highlighted the importance of the carbonyl group and aromatic substituents on the acridone scaffold facilitating ligand interactions, especially through hydrogen bonding. Consequently, our research group aims to optimize these molecular features to develop new, potent bioactive molecular scaffolds.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Acridone Derivatives as Photosystem II Inhibitors: Synthesis, Herbicidal Activity, and Structure-Activity
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Sociedade Brasileira de Quimica (SBQ)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.