Role of family communication and satisfaction on post-traumatic growth in women with cancer
Résumé fourni par la source
Background- Recent studies have shown that traumatic events can also lead to positive changes termed post-traumatic growth (PTG). Cancer is one of the most traumatic illnesses and has a higher incidence rate in women who face numerous challenges in all spheres. Family plays an important role in cancer treatment. The patient's family can have a positive impact on the patient's emotional adaptation to cancer, or they can impede it by reinforcing the denial of the cancer diagnosis. Exploring the role of family dynamics in post-traumatic growth becomes essential. Aims and Objectives- This study focuses on family communication and satisfaction in PTG among women with cancer. Methods and materials- The study was cross-sectional in nature. A sample of 50 women with cancer were selected from a government hospital in Odisha using purposive sampling. Then they were assessed using the FACES-IV Scale, and PTGI-X scale. Correlation and regression analysis were used to interpret the results. Results- Results indicated a significant positive relationship between family communication and PTG (r=.773, P<0.01), as well as family satisfaction and PTG (r=.811, P<0.01). Further, results indicate a substantial relationship between the two predictor variables and PTG (R square= .722, P<0.01); family satisfaction is a better predictor of PTG (β=.528). Conclusion- The study findings indicate that family communication and satisfaction are positive predictors of PTG, with family satisfaction being a better predictor of PTG.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Role of family communication and satisfaction on post-traumatic growth in women with cancer
- Date Crossref
- 30/12/2024
- Éditeur
- GSC Online Press
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.