Comparison of implant stability and marginal bone loss between osseodensification and conventional osteotomy at adjacent implant sites
Rattachement africain : tw. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background/purpose: Osseodensification (OD) has been proposed to enhance implant stability, but the extent of stability and marginal bone changes is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare implant stability and marginal bone changes between osseodensification and conventional drilling (CD) osteotomy at adjacent implant sites. Materials and methods: Forty partially edentulous patients requiring two adjacent implants (n = 80) were enrolled in this study. Each subject underwent one OD osteotomy and one CD osteotomy at adjacent implant sites in the posterior maxilla or posterior mandible. Insertion torque (IT) was recorded with a torque gauge during surgery. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured using a resonance frequency analyzer immediately and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively, while marginal bone loss (MBL) was calculated from standardized periapical radiographs. Results: < 0.05). No significant differences were detected in MBL between OD and CD 12 months postoperatively. Conclusion: Implant stability was significantly higher in OD than in CD, implying the possibility of non-submerged healing or immediate/early provisionalization/loading protocols. MBL was lower in OD than in CD at 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively but was similar at 12 months postoperatively.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparison of implant stability and marginal bone loss between osseodensification and conventional osteotomy at adjacent implant sites
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Department of Clinical Dentistry pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Feng Chia University Advanced Medical Devices and Composites Laboratory pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
School of Dentistry pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
College of Dental Medicine Department of Oral Hygiene pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
College of Pharmacy Department of Fragrance and Cosmetic Science pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Department of Clinical Dentistry — Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital et Advanced Medical Devices and Composites Laboratory — Feng Chia University, avec 3 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.