Common lipidomic signatures across distinct acute brain injuries in patient outcome prediction
Rattachement africain : fi, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Lipidomic alterations have been associated with various neurological diseases. Examining temporal changes in serum lipidomic profiles, irrespective of injury type, reveals promising prognostic indicators. In this longitudinal prospective observational study, serum samples were collected early (46 ± 24 h) and late (142 ± 52 h) post-injury from 70 patients with ischemic stroke, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, and traumatic brain injury that had outcomes dichotomized as favorable (modified Rankin Scores (mRS) 0-3) and unfavorable (mRS 4-6) three months post-injury. Lipidomic profiling of 1153 lipids, analyzed using statistical and machine learning methods, identified 153 lipids with late-stage significant outcome differences. Supervised machine learning pinpointed 12 key lipids, forming a combinatory prognostic equation with high discriminatory power (AUC 94.7 %, sensitivity 89 %, specificity 92 %; p < 0.0001). Enriched functions of the identified lipids were related to sphingolipid signaling, glycerophospholipid metabolism, and necroptosis (p < 0.05, FDR-corrected). The study underscores the dynamic nature of lipidomic profiles in acute brain injuries, emphasizing late-stage distinctions and proposing lipids as significant prognostic markers, transcending injury types. These findings advocate further exploration of lipidomic changes for a comprehensive understanding of pathobiological roles and enhanced prediction for recovery trajectories.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Common lipidomic signatures across distinct acute brain injuries in patient outcome prediction
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.