Utilization of cattle slurry, biogas digestates and separated digestates by injection to organically managed spring barley
Rattachement africain : dk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Nutrient scarcity in organic farming is an important obstacle to the growth of the sector. This study aimed to design a novel anaerobic digestion system for enhancing nitrogen (N) availability and abundance by co-digestion of grass-clover biomass and cattle slurry and a series of post-treatments. The digestates were separated, and the solid fraction was dried and stripped of ammonia. By a novel approach, the liquid fraction was used in a desulfurizing filter for the biogas producing an acidic liquid that was enriched with ammonia resulting in a sulphur-nitrogen-rich fertilizer product (LiqNS). The fertilisers were assessed for their fertilizer value under organic field conditions by direct injection before sowing spring barley. Two field studies were conducted to compare the N fertilizer replacement value (NFRV) of cattle slurry, digestates from co-digestion of cattle slurry and grass-clover, the liquid fractions, the dried fibre fraction of digestates, LiqNS, and mineral fertilizers under organic crop management. A third field study also compared the effect of crop management practices (organic vs. conventional) on NFRV. The field trials showed that cattle slurry, co-digested digestates, liquid digestates, and LiqNS had high NFRV of 80–90 %, with liquid digestates showing consistent performance. Co-digestion of grass-clover and cattle slurry did not change NFRV significantly compared to untreated cattle slurry. Conversely, the dried fibre fraction (DF) exhibited negative NFRV in spring barley due to nitrogen immobilization but no negative yield effect in a N-fixing faba bean crop. Anaerobic mono-digestion of cattle slurry improved NFRV by 16 % compared to untreated cattle slurry. By organic crop management, higher NFRV was estimated than by conventional management, due to lower yield response to mineral fertilization by organic management (11.9 percentage points lower nitrogen use efficiency), but mostly similar responses to organic fertilization under organic and conventional management. A reason for this could be the use of surface application of mineral N fertilizer favouring weed growth in the organic system, while such effects were avoided in both systems by injection of the slurries. Anaerobic digestion and post-treatments of digestates are valuable methods for enhancing nutrient efficiency and availability in organic farming. However, assessing the N fertilizer value of organic manures requires careful consideration of experimental management practices. Additional research is necessary to understand the different responses to mineral N fertilizers by organic management. • N effect of different digestates was evaluated in three field trials. • Post-treatments of digestates diversify fertilizer products. • More available N was generated by co-digestion of slurry and grass-clover silage. • Yield response to slurry were similar in organic and conventional management. • The utilization of mineral fertilizer N was lower by organic than conventional.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Utilization of cattle slurry, biogas digestates and separated digestates by injection to organically managed spring barley
- Date Crossref
- 01/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Aarhus University Department of Agroecology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Department of Agroecology — Aarhus University.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.