Biogenic carbonate samples: Preliminary tests on chemical protocols for radiocarbon analysis

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Most of the carbonate samples have a basic well-defined pretreatment protocol for 14C-AMS dating, but particularities of specific organisms have to be treated with care. This is the case of stromatolite samples, in which carbonate is formed by biogenesis and also has a porous structure that could contain recent organic material as a contaminant. In this work, we analyzed the differences in the radiocarbon content by using organic matter removals before chemical treatment with HCl: sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) a 0.7M solution with pH ∼11, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) an 8.8M solution with pH ∼5. These treatments were chosen because they are the most used in stromatolite samples for geochemical analysis. To compare the impact of the organic matter removal treatments in stromatolite samples we also processed them as regular carbonate samples for radiocarbon analysis, with no organic matter removal (control samples). X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence have been used to obtain mineral and elemental characterization, respectively. H2O2 could not influence the results of Mg-calcite concentrate samples. The use of NaOCl appears to have been effective in preserving more material than H2O2 independent of the mineralogical composition of the stromatolite layers. The F14C results after HCl etching for Mg-calcite concentrated samples were similar to those without etching suggesting that the HCl etching does not impact the results in this case. The organic matter removal is more important than the etching procedure for stromatolite samples. NaOCl is more indicated to be used as chemical pretreatment for radiocarbon analysis purposes independent of the mineral matrix of samples.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.