Endothelial Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Allow to Differentiate Between Various Endotypes of INOCA: A Multicentre, Prospective, Cohort Study
Rattachement africain : pl, nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Ischemia and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) might be due to coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), vasospastic angina (VSA) or both. We compared plasma concentration of various extracellular vesicles (EVs) in patients with different INOCA endotypes. Patients were divided into those with INOCA (CMD, VSA, mixed CMD + VSA) and non-anginal chest pain. Plasma concentrations of EVs were measured using flow cytometry. Out of 96 patients included, 34 had CMD (35%), 15 VSA (16%), 24 mixed endotype (25%) and 23 non-anginal chest pain (24%). Patients with INOCA had lower ratio of endothelial EVs (CD144 +) to total EVs, compared to patients with non-anginal pain (p = 0.027). Patients with mixed endotype had lower ratio of endothelial EVs (CD144 +) to total EVs, compared to CMD (p = 0.008), VSA (p = 0.014) and non-anginal pain (p < 0.001). Decreased ratio of endothelial EVs (CD144 +) to total EVs might serve as a "circulating footprint" of the mixed INOCA endotype. Graphical Abstract CCS – chronic coronary syndrome, CD – cluster of differentiation, CMD – coronary microvascular dysfunction, CFR – coronary flow reserve, EVs – extracellular vesicles, FFR – fractional flow reserve, INOCA - IMR – index of microvascular resistance, VSA – vasospastic angina
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Endothelial Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Allow to Differentiate Between Various Endotypes of INOCA: A Multicentre, Prospective, Cohort Study
- Date Crossref
- 05/12/2024
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.