Aller au contenu principal
2024 conference-abstract

Post Hoc Analysis of Phase III Gecacitinib Clinical Trial Outcomes: Enhanced Understanding and Implications

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
49Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Myelofibrosis clinical manifestations typically include significant splenomegaly, high symptom burden and severe anemia. A phase III study (ZGJAK016) of gecacitinib (also known as jaktinib) met its primary endpoint, demonstrating 64.8% patients with a spleen volume reduction of ≥35% from baseline at week 24, along with favorable benefits in symptoms and anemia (presented at the European Hematology Association Hybrid Congress 2024). Herein, we present additional efficacy data that complement the positive findings from the ZGJAK016 study. Methods: A total of 105 myelofibrosis patients were included in the study (71 patients were randomized to gecacitinib and 34 to hydroxyurea). Key endpoints included changes in spleen length assessed by palpation, individual symptom score improvements, and transfusion independence rate. Transfusion independence was defined as not requiring red blood cell transfusion (except in cases of clinically overt bleeding) for ≥12 weeks, with hemoglobin ≥80 g/L. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. The median spleen lengths were 15.0 cm and 13.3 cm in the gecacitinib and hydroxyurea groups. The median total symptom scores were 20.0 points and 19.0 points, respectively. A total of 77 (73.3%) symptomatic patients had a baseline total symptom score of ≥10 points (50 [70.4%] in the gecacitinib group and 27 [79.4%] in the hydroxyurea group). A lower proportion of patients in the gecacitinib group were transfusion-independent at baseline compared to hydroxyurea (70.4% vs. 76.5%). At Week 2, mean percentage changes from baseline in spleen length were -25.1% and -6.4% in the gecacitinib and hydroxyurea groups, with a higher proportion of patients achieving in a ≥50% decrease in palpable spleen length in the gecacitinib than in the hydroxyurea group (17.4% vs. 0, respectively). 84.5% for gecacitinib and 61.8% for hydroxyurea achieved a ≥50% total symptom score reduction from baseline at any time (p = 0.0109). At Week 24, significant symptom improvement was observed in the gecacitinib group for each individual item, with mean percentage changes from baseline exceeding 50% in almost all cases (fatigue: -52.5%; early satiety: -59.7%; abdominal discomfort: -62%; inactivity: -39.6%; problems with concentration: -44.7%; night sweats: -87.7%; fever: -59.8%; weight loss: -87.6%; itching: -65.1%; and bone pain: -50.6%). In the symptomatic population, patients treated with gecacitinib showed higher rates of symptom improvement-defined as a decrease of at least 2 points-compared to those who received hydroxyurea in most individual items. This was particularly notable in night sweats (69.4% vs. 38.5%). Transfusion independence rates at Week 24 were achieved by 60.6% of 71 patients in the gecacitinib group and 38.2% of 34 in the hydroxyurea group, with a rate difference of 22.8% (95% CI, 3.1% to 42.5%; p = 0.0288). A steady increase in mean hemoglobin levels over time has been observed in patients with a baseline level of less than 100 g/L. Conclusions: The findings indicate that gecacitinib not only reaffirms its high efficacy in splenic size reduction but also demonstrates a rapid onset of action. In terms of symptom improvement, it significantly alleviated a range of symptoms, particularly in symptomatic patients. Regarding anemia, gecacitinib enhanced transfusion independence as evidenced by a higher transfusion independence rate at Week 24 compared to hydroxyurea, with comparable baseline characteristics. The ZGJAK016 study validates the critical role of gecacitinib in addressing the core treatment needs of myelofibrosis patients.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Post Hoc Analysis of Phase III Gecacitinib Clinical Trial Outcomes: Enhanced Understanding and Implications
Date Crossref
05/11/2024
Éditeur
American Society of Hematology
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang UniversityZhejiang UniversityHenan Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegePeking Union Medical College HospitalShanxi Medical UniversitySecond Hospital of Shanxi Medical UniversitySecond Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityXi'an Jiaotong UniversityHebei Medical UniversityFirst Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Medical UniversityGuangdong Academy of Medical SciencesGuangdong Provincial People's HospitalSouthern Medical UniversityJilin UniversityFirst Hospital of Jilin UniversityFirst Hospital of China Medical UniversitySecond Affiliated Hospital of Jilin UniversityChina Medical UniversityZhengzhou People's HospitalShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityRuijin HospitalShanghai Institute of HematologySichuan UniversityWest China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityJiangsu Province HospitalNanjing Medical UniversityUnion HospitalHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyPeking UniversityPeking University People's HospitalFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityPeking University Third HospitalGuiyang Medical UniversityAffiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical UniversityNanfang HospitalLanzhou University Second HospitalLanzhou UniversityWenzhou Central HospitalKunming Medical UniversityJiangxi Provincial People's HospitalCentral South UniversityThird Xiangya HospitalThe Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityChongqing Medical UniversityXiangya Hospital Central South UniversityFirst Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical CollegeSir Run Run Shaw HospitalInstitute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.