Analysis of Methylation of Tumor-suppressive miRNAs andKRAS/TP53Mutations in Pancreatic Juice
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND/AIM: We previously reported the usefulness of detecting aberrant methylation in tumor suppressive microRNAs (miRNAs) in bile and plasma to discriminate pancreaticobiliary cancers from benign pancreaticobiliary diseases. This study analyzed the methylation of miRNAs in pancreatic juice to identify those specific to pancreatic cancer (PC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pancreatic juice was collected from 20 patients with PC, including eight with intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC), two with low grade-pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (LG-PanIN), 32 with LG-intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), and seven with benign pancreatic lesions. Polymerase chain reaction amplification and sequencing were performed for three tumor suppressive miRNAs (miR-200a, 200b, and 1247), and their methylation rates were determined. Additionally, KRAS and TP53 mutations were analyzed. RESULTS: The methylation rate of miR-1247 was significantly higher in patients with PC than in those with LG-PanIN/IPMN. Furthermore, it was significantly higher in patients with IPMC than in those with LG-IPMN. KRAS and TP53 mutations were detected in seven (70%) and one (10%) of the patients with PC, respectively. CONCLUSION: Analyzing the methylation of miR-1247 in addition to KRAS and TP53 mutations in pancreatic juice may be useful to distinguish PC from PanIN/IPMN.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Analysis of Methylation of Tumor-suppressive miRNAs and<i>KRAS/TP53</i>Mutations in Pancreatic Juice
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2024
- Éditeur
- International Institute of Anticancer Research
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.